WHY CREATION MATTERS

While visiting a church where I was to be the guest speaker a couple of years ago, I helped myself to a cup of coffee during the Bible study hour. I could not help but overhear the adult class meeting in the open room nearby. They were discussing a friend who had lost her faith due to watching programs on public television. That network notoriously runs programs to explain “what really happened” in the Bible. As a result, she came to reject the Bible as a collection of fairy tales and “just so” stories.

Excusing myself as I entered the room, I said, “I couldn’t help overhearing your conversation.” They invited me to join them, which I did. I continued. “It’s not difficult to believe that many so-called Christians lose their faith.” “What do you mean?” they asked. “I mean that if you stumble over the very first verse of the Bible, you will have trouble accepting the rest of it.” Genesis 1:1 says, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” I asked them, “How many of you believe in a literal six twenty-four-hour day creation?” They seemed stunned.

Today many Christians believe they are too sophisticated to accept that simple premise. They rationalize. They compromise. The call it a secondary, non-essential doctrine. In fact, the teacher of that class responded, “The Bible does not teach that God created everything in six days.” I had them all turn to the Ten Commandments. In laying down the guidelines for the Sabbath, God told the Israelites: “In six days Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is within them, and on the seventh day he rested” (Exodus 20:11). Nothing here indicated billions or even millions of years. A straightforward reading indicates six literal days. The teacher was shocked. If this were not true, there would have been no basis for the Israelites to observe the seventh-day Sabbath.

John 1:3 says, “All things came into being through him (the Logos, i.e. Christ), and apart from him not one thing came into being that has come into being.” Let that sink in. First of all, Christ is not a created being. He brought everything into existence, but he did not bring himself into existence. The Jehovah’s Witnesses have to do mental gymnastics with this to show that Christ was the first created being. This passage does not support that interpretation, which has gone around since the first century heresy of Arianism.

Colossians 1:16 says, “All things in the heavens and on the earth were created by him, things visible and things invisible…all things were created through him and for him.” The New World Translation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses blatantly adds the word [other] to change the obvious meaning of the passage. They claim that although the word is not found in the original text, it clarifies the meaning; but it actually distorts the clear equating of Christ with Jehovah, a claim they cannot tolerate.

In the last Gospel presentation made to mankind, the angel says, “Fear God and give him glory, because the hour of his judgment has come, and worship the one who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and the springs of water” (Revelation 14:7). The glory of God is related to his nature as Creator.

At that time, people will be given a choice to worship the Creator, or the Beast. Revelation 14:11 says of those who choose the Beast: “the smoke of their torment went up forever and ever, and those who worshiped the beast and his image did not have rest day and night.”

By downplaying the doctrine of Creation, you are actually robbing Christ of his glory as the Creator. Creation is not a secondary, non-essential doctrine at all. If you doubt the truth of the very first verse of the Bible, you will have trouble all the way through it. However, if you do not stumble at the first verse, you will have no trouble believing that the God who created the universe controls it and sustains it. You will have no trouble believing that the Creator can intervene in his creation at any time, and that he is directing it toward a purposeful end. When that end comes, what side will you be on? Will you stand with the Creator or sit with the assembly of scoffers? (Psalm 1:1). Will you worship the Christ of Creation or the beast of destruction?

 

 

Advertisements

Brave New Worlds?

 

Driving to work early one morning, I approached an intersection. The vehicle facing me in the other lane had stopped at the red light, and its lights were shining in my direction. As I moved toward it, I noticed someone walking in front of the headlights.

Judging by what I saw, it could have been a Hispanic man. He might have weighed between 200 and 225 pounds. He was probably five feet away from the bumper of the car and moving in a westward to eastwardly direction at approximately three miles per hour. His hair may have been black and it could have been parted on the left side. He may have been going to work that morning, and maybe he worked for some oilfield service company.

He could have been wearing a maroon shirt that may have been recently washed with an aromatic detergent. He could have had a pocket knife in his right-hand pocket. He might have spoken English, and might have had a Spanish accent, and he might have been from Mexico. He could have had a tattoo between his shoulder blades which might have been in the shape of an eagle. He also could have had a pierced ear.

You may be asking yourself, “How can you tell all that from a person walking in front of the headlights of a car?” You know there is not enough information to make such determinations simply by passing in front of a light. Did you notice how many times I used the terms could have, might have, and may have? Did you notice that I left a way out each time? I didn’t say that he was Hispanic; I said he could been a Hispanic man. I didn’t say he had black hair parted on the left side. I said he may have had black hair parted on the left side.

Again this week NASA has announced the discovery of seven new exoplanets (http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/science/astronomers-find-7-earth-size-planets-where-life-may-be-possible/ar-AAne8q7), that is, supposedly earthlike planets outside our own solar system. The title of the article states that astronomers have found seven earthlike planets where “life is possible.” How do they know if life is possible? How did they determine that? As you read through the article, and listen to the video narration, you will notice how many times they use the words could, might, and may.

Three of the planets, they say, are within the life zone that may support life. They say that one may have an atmosphere that could contain water vapor that might mean there is water on the surface of the planet. And how did they determine all this? They looked at a star forty light years away and noticed a diminished amount of light coming from the star. That can only mean one thing, a planet passing in front of it. All the rest is speculation, just like my story about the person I saw passing in front of the headlights of a car.

If it is all such speculation, why are scientists so determined to find life on other planets? It is not a scientific question, but a philosophical question. They are so convinced that evolution is true, and therefore, life must have evolved on one of the many “earth-like” planets out there. They believe that finding life on other planets would justify their belief in evolution. However, even finding life on another planet would not prove that evolution is true. Evolution has too many scientific problems to be true, and it is not supported by observable, empirical science. It just “has to be” because the alternative is untenable. They will never be dissuaded despite the lack of evidence to support evolution.

If the planets are forty light years away, it would take that long just to send a signal and another 40 years to receive a response. Traveling at the speed of light, it would take forty years to get there. Even travelling at ten times the speed of light would require four years to travel even if a ship could travel that fast. Stars would never go zipping by in the background as they do in science fiction movies such as Star Wars. All this is designed to tell us that we got here merely by processes that can be explained naturally. Again, these are not scientific issues, but philosophical. It is a reason to explain the existence of everything without believing in a Creator God.

What would scientists expect to find in space? Paul wrote, “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” Finding life on another planet is an excuse to accept evolution and disbelieve God’s Word.

What should we find in the heavens? “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech, they use no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world” (Psalm 19:1-4). Rather than trying to find alien life in the heavens to disprove God, we should look to the heavens and see His glory. There is no excuse not to believe in God. Through Christ, you can have a relationship with the Creator God of this universe. Apart from him, you will only be searching through the darkness.